Showing posts with label NEWS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NEWS. Show all posts

Thursday, September 8, 2011

Did we really land on the moon?



p.s:-The purpose of this article is to share fascinating and interesting conspiracy theories about the moon landing.There are significant number of people out there who believes that nasa actually faked the moon landing.I dont intend to say that we didnt land on the moon or we did,it's totally upto you to decide. :)

It has been more than 40 years since Neil Armstrong made that first step on the Moon. Yet, there are a few people who still ask, “Did we really land on the moon?”

There are those who spread conspiracy theories alleging that those Moon landings were all fake.

Was the moon landing fake ??? did we ever land on the moon ??
read this >>
1) When the astronauts are putting up the American flag it waves. There is no wind on the Moon.

2) No stars are visible in the pictures taken by the Apollo astronauts from the surface of the Moon.

3) No blast crater is visible in the pictures taken of the lunar landing module.

4) The landing module weighs 17 tons and yet sits on top of the sand making no impression. Next to it astronauts’ footprints can be seen in the sand.

5) The footprints in the fine lunar dust, with no moisture or atmosphere or strong gravity, are unexpectedly well preserved, as if made in wet sand.

6) When the landing module takes off from the Moon’s surface there is no visible flame from the rocket.

7) If you speed up the film of the astronauts walking on the Moon’s surface they look like they were filmed on Earth and slowed down.

8.) The astronauts could not have survived the trip because of exposure to radiation from the Van Allen radiation belt.

9) The rocks brought back from the Moon are identical to rocks collected by scientific expeditions to Antarctica.

10) All six Moon landings happened during the Nixon administration. No other national leader has claimed to have landed astronauts on the Moon, despite 40 years of rapid technological development.

11)The Moon's surface during the daytime is so hot that camera film would have melted.

12)Why hasn't nasa sent another spacecraft to the moon since 70's?The reason given is: lack of money.

13)One NASA picture from Apollo 11 is looking up at Neil Armstrong about to take his giant step for mankind. The photographer must have been lying on the planet surface. If Armstrong was the first man on the Moon, then who took the shot?




In 1968 NASA Chief Astronaut, Deke Slayton, (one of the main perpetrators of faking Apollo), visited the film set of "2001 Space Odyssey", in the UK He referred to it as NASA East, and it was here that he got the idea for filming the mock lunar module, and command module separation and docking. Film of the alleged booster stage falling away from module was also sequenced on Kubrick's film set. Think about it, how could you install a camera in the center part of a rocket booster engine without it being burned to a crisp? It can only be done on a film set, and why is it we only see this sequence, albeit repeated for each Apollo mission, only on the Moon missions, and not on any other space mission? TV pictures allegedly beamed back to Earth showing the lunar module separation, were razor sharp color images, why therefore were the TV transmissions from the Moon gray and fuzzy, after all they were supposedly transmitted across the same distance in space?

In Tim Furniss's book "One Small Step", there are numerous references to mechanical, electrical, and other problematic failures in practically EVERY Gemini and Apollo mission. It's unbelievable that the USA ever got into space at all, let alone to the Moon and back, which of course they did not. Many NASA space problems and failures continued long after the Apollo program, and still continue today. If NASA could achieve such amazing feats 42 years ago, then space technology has gone backwards instead of forward.
However, only 2 years later, American President John F. Kennedy set a goal in May 1961, when he made the following famous speech. 'I believe that this nation should commit itself. To achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth. No single space project in this period will be more impressive to mankind or more important for the long range exploration of Space.' It was just eight years later in 1969, that man finally left Earth and set foot on the Moon... Or so we have been led to believe.

In western Australia during the live broadcast of the Apollo 11 moon landing, several people saw a very unusual occurrence. One viewer, Una Ronald watched the telecast and was astonished with what she saw.

The residents of Honeysuckle Creek, Australia, actually saw a different broadcast to the rest of the World. Just shortly before Armstrong stepped onto the Moons surface, a change could be seen where the picture goes from a stark black to a brighter picture. Honeysuckle Creek stayed with the picture and although the voice transmissions were broadcast from Goldstone, the actual film footage was broadcast from Australia. As Una watched Armstrong walking on the surface of the Moon she spotted a Coke bottle that was kicked in the right hand side of the picture. This was in the early hours of the morning and she phoned her friends to see if they had seen the same thing, unfortunately they had missed it but were going to watch the rebroadcast the next day. Needless to say, the footage had been edited and the offending Coke bottle had been cut out of the film. But several other viewers had seen the bottle and many articles appeared in The West Australian newspaper.

Western Australia received their coverage in a different way to the rest of the World. They were the only Country where there wasn't a delay to the 'live' transmission. Bill Kaysing says 'NASA and other connected agencies couldn't get to the Moon and back and so went to ARPA (Advanced Research Projects Agency) in Massachusetts and asked them how they could simulate the actual landing and space walks. We have to remember that all communications with Apollo were run and monitored by NASA, and therefore journalists who thought they were hearing men on the Moon could have easily been misled. All NASA footage was actually filmed off TV screens at Houston Mission Control for the TV coverage... No one in the media were given the raw footage.

So why Would nasa fake it?
One of the major reasons believed for it is The Space Race.
The US government deemed it vital that it win the Space Race against the Soviet Union. Going to the Moon would be risky and expensive, as exemplified by John F. Kennedy famously stating that the United States chose to go because it was hard.



Since most conspiracists believe that sending men to the Moon was impossible at the time, they argue that landings had to be faked to fulfill President Kennedy's 1961 promise: "achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth". Others have claimed that, with all the known and unknown hazards, NASA would not have risked the public humiliation of astronauts crashing to their deaths on the lunar surface, broadcast on live TV.










Sunday, August 28, 2011

The World's First Fully Sustainable,Zero-Carbon,Zero-Waste City.-Masdar.

 

Masdar  is an ecological project in Abu Dhabi, in the United Arab Emirates.It will be the world's first carbon neutral, zero waste and fully sustainable city.The project is headed by the Abu Dhabi Future Energy Company (ADFEC).Started in 2006, the project will cost US$22 billion and take about eight years to build(first phase).Final completion is scheduled to occur between 2020 and 2025.




 The city will rely entirely on solar energy and other renewable energy sources, with a sustainable, zero-carbon, zero-waste ecology.A multitude of green technologies will be utilised - including a solar power plant, rooftop photovoltaics, wind farms, geothermal sources and a hydrogen power plant. The city's water needs will be fulfilled by a solar-powered desalination plant. 


Automobiles will be banned within the city; travel will be accomplished via public mass transit and personal rapid transit systems, with existing road and railways connecting to other locations outside the city

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

How Torrent Websites Work?Everything about torrents.

  
Who Owns Torrent Websites and Why is it hard to catch Torrent owners?

Common people own torrent sites, and it is not them distributing the material. It's the users. Most of the users do not have any sort of permission to distribute or even use the material, so it's all illegal. Nobody cracks down on them, though, since torrents are not just from one source; bits and pieces of the file comes from every hard-drive of anyone who downloaded the torrent. When you open the torrent, the program has to receive the file from perhaps thousands of different places. This makes it harder to trace and to find the origins of the original torrent. That's why no one does anything about the illegal downloads.

Bittorrents (also known as "torrents") work by downloading small bits of files from many different web sources at the same time.

How torrent networking started?

Torrent networking debuted in 2001. A Python-language programmer, Bram Cohen, created the technology with the intent to share it with everyone. And indeed, its popularity has taken off since 2005. The torrent community has now grown to millions of users worldwide in 2009. Because torrents strive to screen out dummy and corrupt files, are mostly free of adware/spyware, and achieve amazing download speeds, torrent popularity is still growing fast. By straight gigabytes of bandwidth used, bittorrent networking is the most popular activity on the Internet today.

How companies catch torrent owners/sharers/downloaders?

Often they(companies)place fake files, called honeypots, that people want to download. Pricey packages like adobe cs3 or the latest top 40 mp3. When you attempt to download the files, they are given your IP Address when you first connect. They can use that address to check what files you are making available and your location.

There are specialized groups at most major companies whose job is to monitor pirated software outlets. Companies like Microsoft, Adobe, and especially the RIAA (music industry) and MPAA (movie industry) all have people that actively monitor popular torrents to see who is seeding. They usually download enough from you (appearing to be just another user) to prove you are distributing their content then they will determine your ISP and send them a "scary legal letter" hoping to get your subscriber information (which has worked on some ISPs in the past). Then they can sue you.

Sunday, August 14, 2011

A women fined $1.5 million for downloading 24 songs illegally from internet.


This is probably the most bizzare and insane case i have ever heard about piracy.Jamie thomas-Rasset,a mother of four from minnesota has been penalized $1.5 million for downloading 24 songs illegally from internet.She downloaded those 24 songs from peer-to-peer file-sharing network Kazaa in 2006.She was ordered to pay 62,500 dollars for each of the 24 songs, a total of 1.5 million dollars. It's a heavy penalty considering the 24 songs would only cost approximately $24 on iTunes, which was Thomas-Rasset' argument, too.

 In her first trial, in 2007, the jury demanded she pay $222,000 for violating the copyright law.Thomas-Rasset maintained she wasn't the computer user who did the file sharing, and her legal team cited an error in jury instruction to secure a second trial in 2009 that ended with a much harsher result: an astronomical fine of $1.92 million. However, later in 2010 U.S. District Court judge found the $1.92 million penalty against Thomas-Rasset to be "monstrous and shocking" and "gross injustice" before lowering it to $54,000, or $2,250 a song. Thomas-Rasset and her legal team has decided to appeal this decision, too.This story has the potential to drag on well into the next decade -- when for $1.5 million, all of Thomas-Rasset's four kids could finish law school and take up the fight on her behalf.



The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), was pleased by the most recent decision, even if it has no intention to collect the $1.5 million from Thomas-Rasset. "Now with three jury decisions behind us along with a clear affirmation of Ms. Thomas-Rasset's willful liability, it is our hope that she finally accepts responsibility for her actions," the RIAA said in a statement. Earlier, the RIAA offered Thomas-Rasset the opportunity to end the legal battle for $25,000 and an admission of guilt; Thomas-Rasset declined. 


Monday, August 8, 2011

Riots In london-2011

Rioters facing police




A rioter gets medical help before getting arrested.




The riots kicked off in Tottenham on august 6th and then spread to Wood Green, Enfield Town and Ponders End. Later, it spread to Walthamstow Central, Islington and Oxford Circus. The riots then spread as far as Brixton, Streatham and even Croydon.

Attacks were carried out against the Metropolitan Police Service while local businesses were looted and set alight. At least 26 police officers were injured.
Mark Duggan

What caused riots?

A 29-year-old black man Mark Duggan was killed by police in a shootout on 4th August 2011 The shooting took place on the Ferry Lane bridge, next to Tottenham Hale station.As said by police mark was a cocaine dealer and member of the 'Star Gang'.Marks family and relatives claimed that he was unarmed when the shooting took place.

A peaceful protest takes a violent turn

On 6 August a peaceful protest was held, beginning at Broadwater Farm and finishing at Tottenham police station The protest was organised by friends and relatives of Duggan to demand justice for the family. Around 200 people participated in this protest.The unrest occurred in the context of tense relations between the police and the black community in north London.

Attacks were carried out on police cars, a double-decker bus and local businesses and homes from around 22:30. . Stores were looted by rioters after windows were smashed. A number of people were left homeless. Fireworks, petrol bombs and other missiles were also thrown at police.

On 7th august  in green wood,two miles away a widespread looting broke out in which around 100 youths targeted high-street game shops, electrical stores and clothing chains. Others ransacked local shops on Wood Green High Road.

Mark Zuckerberg's Sister Quits Facebook To Start Her Own Social Media Venture.


Randi Zuckerberg, sister of Facebook.com founder Mark Zuckerberg left facebook -after six years working faithfully as Facebook's director of market.Randi is the founder of her new organization RtoZ media which will be working with other media houses to help them build programming helpful for making social media supportive platforms.


The tech bloggers of Silicon Valley are rubbing their hands at the prospect of some sibling rivalry to follow on from the multiple lawsuits that the younger Zuckerberg - he's 27, she's 29 - has endured over the parentage of his wildly popular website.



Most bloggers wonder what randy hopes to achieve that she has'nt in one of the worlds fastest growing companies.Randi is unlikely to be planning anything excessively controversial. She appears to have decided to have fun with her money and her instantly recognisable last name to branch out on her own, without doing anything to damage the Facebook brand she worked for so long to help establish, it said

"I'm proud of what I've done here… but I know I'll be able to do just as much, or more, for Facebook once I'm on the outside," she wrote in her resignation letter. She said her goal was "to launch my own innovative programming and work with media firms," adding: "Facebook will clearly be a central element in all my projects."

Thursday, August 4, 2011

Five year old's 911 call saves dad's life.


It took a five-year-old girl to save her father's life. She talked to 911 dispatchers when she thought her father was having a heart attack.

About 9:30 Monday night, Hancock county dispatcher Jason Bonham got a call. At first, he couldn't understand the person who was on the line.

A man was in distress and unable to speak.

"You could hear the father hear a little bit where he said tell 'em or take it," said Bonham.

That's when Savannah, the man's five-year-old daughter, picked up the phone.

"My dad can't hardly breathe," she told Bonham.

The call to 911 came from a cell phone, so dispatchers didn't automatically have an address.

With her father's help, the little voice clearly repeated their street address, and with time of the essence, gave dispatchers all the information they needed.

"Is your Daddy still awake?"

"Yeah."

"Most people when you talk to them, they're hysterical," said Bonham.

Her calm was not nearly as surprising as her tender age.

"How old are you?"

"I'm five years old."

"Every time I've listened to it it's amazing. She's just a little person," said Bonham.

For nearly ten minutes she stayed on the line, handling a scary situation with courage and grace.

"He looks like he's real shaky," Savannah said.

"You're doing a good job, all right, Savannah? They should be there in a few minutes."

"How many minutes?"

"Okay, you have to stay awake they'll be here in a couple minutes."

"It's okay, Dad."

"We were able to get 'em there versus four to five minutes delay of trying to get an address and another delay of getting them there," said Bonham.

Savannah is now credited for saving her father's life.

The girl's father was back at work Wednesday as doctors try to figure out what happened.

Thursday, July 21, 2011

Google to warn spamware victims via site.!!!



Google has begun issuing warnings to millions of people that their PC has been infected with a virus.Those hit by the virus will be warned with a message that will appear at the top of the searches.

The search firm estimates that more than two million people have been hit by the infection.Google uncovered the huge number of infected machines while doing routine maintenance on a data centre.

During maintenance, Google servers get taken offline and typically this means search traffic for that cluster of machines dries up.

However, wrote Damian Menscher on the official Google blog, switching off one cluster did not stop all traffic.

Investigation revealed that the traffic was being generated b a virus on perhaps a million Windows machines. The virus bounced packets of data off the net address of the Google servers to find out if they were online.

"The malware appears to have gotten onto users' computers from one of roughly a hundred variants of fake anti-virus, or 'fake AV' software that has been in circulation for a while," wrote Mr Menscher.

The main effect of the virus seems to be to funnel search requests through intermediate sites that promote fake security programs and other scams.

Google will be putting a warning at the top of search results seen by people with a machine known to have bounced data off the Google servers. The warning contains a link to advice pages that help people update their anti-virus and clean up their PC.

So far, said Google, it has warned "hundreds of thousands" of users and expects to notify many more.Google to warn PC virus victims via search site

Google has begun issuing warnings to millions of people that their PC has been infected with a virus.Those hit by the virus will be warned with a message that will appear at the top of the searches.The search firm estimates that more than two million people have been hit by the infection.Google uncovered the huge number of infected machines while doing routine maintenance on a data centre.

During maintenance, Google servers get taken offline and typically this means search traffic for that cluster of machines dries up.

However, wrote Damian Menscher on the official Google blog, switching off one cluster did not stop all traffic.

Investigation revealed that the traffic was being generated b a virus on perhaps a million Windows machines. The virus bounced packets of data off the net address of the Google servers to find out if they were online.

"The malware appears to have gotten onto users' computers from one of roughly a hundred variants of fake anti-virus, or 'fake AV' software that has been in circulation for a while," wrote Mr Menscher.

The main effect of the virus seems to be to funnel search requests through intermediate sites that promote fake security programs and other scams.

Google will be putting a warning at the top of search results seen by people with a machine known to have bounced data off the Google servers. The warning contains a link to advice pages that help people update their anti-virus and clean up their PC.

So far, said Google, it has warned "hundreds of thousands" of users and expects to notify many more.

source:- http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-14232577